My Reflection on Learning Theories

As I reflect on the learning theories, I am captivated by my gain knowledge from the collaborative communication of networks from peers and independent study. This deepens my understanding of how individuals can depict how well they can succeed using suitable methods and approaches. The connectivity we have from technology, cultural tools to past knowledge and ideas from one generation to the next, and personal experiences create a profound reality unique to each person. As individuals and technology evolve, so does the concepts and theories of each study. Many past studies have evolved, and knowledge is now gained through months, not decades, caused by technology and half-life (Siemens, 2005). Subsequently, renowned studies will also come into existence due to the advances.    

An area that surprised me the most was learning styles. Too quickly, people will jump on to the latest and greatest and try to overgeneralize information without researching the probable cause supporting their concept. However, discovering it was based on Garden’s Multiple Intelligence taken out of context is quite revolving. Strauss (2013) states that labeling individuals based on their learning style are not helpful nor well designed. Uncovering the multiple intelligence one possesses highlights what we should direct our attention to, encouraging individuals to develop their multiple intelligence and not solely on logical-mathematical intelligence or learning styles. Additionally, it has brought me to the epiphany that one should inquire about the research-based evidence before implementing any new technology.

I have learned that the mind is a powerful tool that processes information and internalizes material most valuable. Through metacognition and volition, it pushes you past distractions to discover more effective ways to learn and better methodology to explore new concepts. Volition causes your intentions from being aspirations or desires to being put into action (Keller, 2008). I know now that I can employ strategies to improve my cognitive aptitudes vastly and regain focus and attention when faced with obstacles. The awareness of this concept allowed me to shift my mindset and explore various avenues to be successful, as I instinctively can inquire about on my own and expand my knowledge.

There are many connections between learning theories from influential factors, implementing technology, and motivation reasoning essential for gaining knowledge. Across multiple studies, a recurring element is the environment and how the individual responds to the stimuli, facilitating learning. Memory plays a significant part in retaining knowledge and transferring the skill or awareness into their daily lives. Furthermore, educational technology connects individuals to the methodology to gain experience and comprehension. Like the intricate social network, all learning theories intertwine and bind in one way or another; therefore, it’s nearly impossible to separate their strategy or technique without it being based on or evolving by the presents of other learning theories.   

As I begin developing e-learning solutions, I will implement the strategies and methods from various learning theories. The combination of all will have a more enriching approach that takes the best of each world. The different _ism can provide valuable information since either one can depict a complete picture independently (Kerr, 2007). Assessing the different approaches each learning theory focuses on, I will utilize them to design specific methods for individuals to comprehend the concept best. Using the ARCS model, motivational strategies can also be applied to the design to encourage student’s completion and gain the knowledge for their needs. Andragogy has also helped deepen my understanding of factors and principles that need to be considered when designing training specifically for busy self-directed, experience-filled individuals. Considering what is essential to the adult learner can streamline your training more effectively, utilize their time wisely, and in return, they will appreciate and gain the knowledge necessary for their achievement and success.  

Reference:

Keller, J (2008). An integrative Theory of Motion, Volition, and Performance. Technology, Instruction, Cognition, and Learning, 6(2), 79-104.

Kerr, B (2009, Jan 01). _isms as filter, not Blinker. Retrieved by http://billkerr2.blogspot.com/2007/01/isms-as-filter-not-blinker.html

Siemens, G. (2005). Connectivism: A learning theory for the digital age. International Journal of Instructional Design & Distance Learning, 2(1). Retrieved from http://www.itdl.org/Journal/Jan_05/article01.htm

Strauss, V. (2013, Oct 16). Howard Gardner: ‘Multiple intelligences’ are not ‘learning styles.’ The Chronicle of Higher Education. Retrieved from http://chronicle.com/artivle/Matching-Teaching-styles-to/49497/